CVE-2005-2773
HP OpenView Network Node Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Hewlett Packard (HP) OpenView Network Node Manager
HP OpenView Network Node Manager 6.2 through 7.50 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (1) node parameter to connectedNodes.ovpl, (2) cdpView.ovpl, (3) freeIPaddrs.ovpl, and (4) ecscmg.ovpl.
Exploitation status
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities
Listed by CISA on 25 March 2022. US federal agencies were required to remediate it by 15 April 2022.
EPSS — exploitation probability
FIRST puts the probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days at 74.6%, which is higher than 99.5% of all scored vulnerabilities. EPSS is a forecast of activity, not a measure of severity, and it is rescored daily.
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Frequently asked questions
Is CVE-2005-2773 being exploited by ransomware groups?
No ransomware group in this database is currently recorded as exploiting CVE-2005-2773.
What does CVE-2005-2773 affect?
CVE-2005-2773 affects Hewlett Packard (HP) OpenView Network Node Manager. HP OpenView Network Node Manager 6.2 through 7.50 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (1) node parameter to connectedNodes.ovpl, (2) cdpView.ovpl, (3) freeIPaddrs.ovpl, and (4) ecscmg.ovpl.
How severe is CVE-2005-2773?
CVE-2005-2773 is rated CRITICAL with a CVSS base score of 9.8. EPSS puts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days at 74.6%, higher than 99.5% of all scored vulnerabilities. It is listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, with a federal remediation deadline of 15 April 2022.
How should organisations respond to CVE-2005-2773?
Apply the vendor patch for Hewlett Packard (HP) OpenView Network Node Manager as the first priority, and treat any internet-facing instance as the most urgent. Because this vulnerability is associated with ransomware activity, also review whether the affected systems were reachable before patching, rather than assuming that patching alone closes the incident.