Skip to content
CTI Academy Sponsor CTI Academy
MEDIUM · CVSS 4.3 CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability

CVE-2016-0162

Microsoft Internet Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Microsoft Internet Explorer

Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 through 11 allows remote attackers to determine the existence of files via crafted JavaScript code, aka "Internet Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability."

CVSS
4.3
MEDIUM
EPSS
21.9%
30-day exploitation
Ransomware groups
0
recorded exploiting
Published
12 Apr 2016
NVD

Exploitation status

CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities

Listed by CISA on 24 May 2022. US federal agencies were required to remediate it by 14 June 2022.

EPSS — exploitation probability

FIRST puts the probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days at 21.9%, which is higher than 97.7% of all scored vulnerabilities. EPSS is a forecast of activity, not a measure of severity, and it is rescored daily.

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Frequently asked questions

Is CVE-2016-0162 being exploited by ransomware groups?

No ransomware group in this database is currently recorded as exploiting CVE-2016-0162.

What does CVE-2016-0162 affect?

CVE-2016-0162 affects Microsoft Internet Explorer. Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 through 11 allows remote attackers to determine the existence of files via crafted JavaScript code, aka "Internet Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability."

How severe is CVE-2016-0162?

CVE-2016-0162 is rated MEDIUM with a CVSS base score of 4.3. EPSS puts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days at 21.9%, higher than 97.7% of all scored vulnerabilities. It is listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, with a federal remediation deadline of 14 June 2022.

How should organisations respond to CVE-2016-0162?

Apply the vendor patch for Microsoft Internet Explorer as the first priority, and treat any internet-facing instance as the most urgent. Because this vulnerability is associated with ransomware activity, also review whether the affected systems were reachable before patching, rather than assuming that patching alone closes the incident.