Skip to content
CTI Academy Sponsor CTI Academy
HIGH · CVSS 7.8 CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability

CVE-2018-5002

Adobe Flash Player Stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

Adobe Flash Player

Adobe Flash Player versions 29.0.0.171 and earlier have a Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user.

CVSS
7.8
HIGH
EPSS
25.1%
30-day exploitation
Ransomware groups
0
recorded exploiting
Published
9 Jul 2018
CWE-787, CWE-121

Exploitation status

CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities

Listed by CISA on 23 May 2022. US federal agencies were required to remediate it by 13 June 2022.

EPSS — exploitation probability

FIRST puts the probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days at 25.1%, which is higher than 97.9% of all scored vulnerabilities. EPSS is a forecast of activity, not a measure of severity, and it is rescored daily.

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Frequently asked questions

Is CVE-2018-5002 being exploited by ransomware groups?

No ransomware group in this database is currently recorded as exploiting CVE-2018-5002.

What does CVE-2018-5002 affect?

CVE-2018-5002 affects Adobe Flash Player. Adobe Flash Player versions 29.0.0.171 and earlier have a Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user.

How severe is CVE-2018-5002?

CVE-2018-5002 is rated HIGH with a CVSS base score of 7.8. EPSS puts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days at 25.1%, higher than 97.9% of all scored vulnerabilities. It is listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, with a federal remediation deadline of 13 June 2022.

How should organisations respond to CVE-2018-5002?

Apply the vendor patch for Adobe Flash Player as the first priority, and treat any internet-facing instance as the most urgent. Because this vulnerability is associated with ransomware activity, also review whether the affected systems were reachable before patching, rather than assuming that patching alone closes the incident.