Skip to content
CTI Academy Sponsor CTI Academy
HIGH · CVSS 7.8 CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability

CVE-2024-32896

Android Pixel Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

Android Pixel

there is a possible way to bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

CVSS
7.8
HIGH
EPSS
3%
30-day exploitation
Ransomware groups
0
recorded exploiting
Published
13 Jun 2024
CWE-670, CWE-783

Exploitation status

CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities

Listed by CISA on 13 June 2024. US federal agencies were required to remediate it by 4 July 2024.

EPSS — exploitation probability

FIRST puts the probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days at 3%, which is higher than 87.4% of all scored vulnerabilities. EPSS is a forecast of activity, not a measure of severity, and it is rescored daily.

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Frequently asked questions

Is CVE-2024-32896 being exploited by ransomware groups?

No ransomware group in this database is currently recorded as exploiting CVE-2024-32896.

What does CVE-2024-32896 affect?

CVE-2024-32896 affects Android Pixel. there is a possible way to bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

How severe is CVE-2024-32896?

CVE-2024-32896 is rated HIGH with a CVSS base score of 7.8. EPSS puts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days at 3%, higher than 87.4% of all scored vulnerabilities. It is listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, with a federal remediation deadline of 4 July 2024.

How should organisations respond to CVE-2024-32896?

Apply the vendor patch for Android Pixel as the first priority, and treat any internet-facing instance as the most urgent. Because this vulnerability is associated with ransomware activity, also review whether the affected systems were reachable before patching, rather than assuming that patching alone closes the incident.