Skip to content
CTI Academy Sponsor CTI Academy
HIGH · CVSS 8.8 CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability

CVE-2025-5419

Google Chromium V8 Out-of-Bounds Read and Write Vulnerability

Google Chromium V8

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 137.0.7151.68 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

CVSS
8.8
HIGH
EPSS
7.8%
30-day exploitation
Ransomware groups
0
recorded exploiting
Published
3 Jun 2025
CWE-125, CWE-787

Exploitation status

CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities

Listed by CISA on 5 June 2025. US federal agencies were required to remediate it by 26 June 2025.

EPSS — exploitation probability

FIRST puts the probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days at 7.8%, which is higher than 94.7% of all scored vulnerabilities. EPSS is a forecast of activity, not a measure of severity, and it is rescored daily.

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Frequently asked questions

Is CVE-2025-5419 being exploited by ransomware groups?

No ransomware group in this database is currently recorded as exploiting CVE-2025-5419.

What does CVE-2025-5419 affect?

CVE-2025-5419 affects Google Chromium V8. Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 137.0.7151.68 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

How severe is CVE-2025-5419?

CVE-2025-5419 is rated HIGH with a CVSS base score of 8.8. EPSS puts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days at 7.8%, higher than 94.7% of all scored vulnerabilities. It is listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, with a federal remediation deadline of 26 June 2025.

How should organisations respond to CVE-2025-5419?

Apply the vendor patch for Google Chromium V8 as the first priority, and treat any internet-facing instance as the most urgent. Because this vulnerability is associated with ransomware activity, also review whether the affected systems were reachable before patching, rather than assuming that patching alone closes the incident.